Control and punishment: The
Statutes of India, promulgated in 1642, controlled slave ownership and
all matters relating to slaves. But, in practice, slave-owners
themselves were the immediate instrument of control and punishment. The
Statutes permitted a slave-owner to punish his slaves for a mild offence
with extra duties, but beating and flogging were forbidden. When the
free burghers were allowed to buy slaves, Van Riebeeck made it a
condition that they keep a whip or lash in the house for chastising
their slaves. But when, almost immediately, slaves began to escape, he
allowed owners to keep escaped slaves in chains. Where owner’s thought
that slaves deserved severe punishment, they were to report to the
Council of Justice. Slaves, in turn, were to report ill treatment,
although it is debatable whether slaves fully understood this.
The "whites"
fear of an uprising is reflected in a law, which forbade more than two
slaves belonging to different owners, to meet at anytime. There was also
a curfew, which required any slaves out of doors after 10pm to carry a
lantern, unless accompanying a member of the owner’s family. In
practice, slaves often disregarded these restrictions and pursued their
amusements such as gambling with dice, cockfighting, fishing, drinking
coffee or brandy, and even smoking opium.
Under
criminal law — and there were many offences which, when carried out by
a slave, were crimes — slaves received harsh punishment. Exceptions
were made in the case of bigamy and adultery, for which whites were
severely punished and not the slaves.
Sex between
slaves and masters: A
law forbidding sexual intercourse between white men and slave women was
broken with impunity. In one case, however, a soldier named Jan Rutter
and a slave named Catrijn van de Kaap were found guilty of this offence.
Rutter was sentenced, and deprived of one month’s salary, while his
partner was sentenced to be flogged and to work for six months in
chains.
It was considered more
reprehensible if a white woman committed adultery with a slave than if a
white man did. Hester Jansz, found guilty at the Cape of committing this
offence on the island of Mauritius, was sentenced to be flogged and to
work for five years in chains. The slave’s fate was not recorded at
the Cape.
In the case of
gambling, which was forbidden, the court ordered two young officials to
repay a slave, Catrijn vanBengalen, 50 of 80 rix-dollars, which they won
from her in an evening of card playing. In addition, the officials were
fined, but there appears to have been no charge against Catrijn
A
privately owned slave, Paul van Malabar, was found guilty of keeping a
female Company slave named Calafora in his room for three days and
nights he was sentenced, to be flogged and branded — not for the
sexual offence, but for depriving the Company of the labour of one of
its slaves. Calafora was pregnant and sentence was postponed until after
she gave birth.
Slaves
sent by their owners beyond a certain distance were obliged to carry a
pass, signed by the owner, stating the particulars of the mission.
Owners who could not write had to buy a lead token from the Company,
engraved with the names of owner and slave, which served as a pass.
Anyone who arrested a slave without a pass received a reward from the
slave's owner.
Farm
slaves often worked under the immediate supervision of a mondoor
(overseer), who was a slave, usually Cape born and chosen for this
senior position by his owner. A mondoor received benefits, such as
permission to sleep in the women's section of the slave quarters. Other supervisors were the knechte, unskilled European laborers or
soldiers of the lowest rank, who were not far above the slaves in the
social hierarchy. The knechte had to keep the balance between a high
rate of production and the welfare of the slaves who, in turn, felt they
were overworked and retaliated with violence — fights between knechte and slaves were frequent.
An owner who felt
that his slave deserved a beating could take him to special assistants
of the Fiscal (prosecutor), known as ‘kaffirs’,in order to be
flogged. The kaffirs were Asians who had committed criminal offences in
other Dutch colonies and been banished to the Cape, where they now
served as an elementary police force.
Justice was
rigorously administered — and sentences were barbaric in the extreme. Runaway
slaves who were recaptured were flogged, branded with a red-hot iron on
the back or cheek and sentenced to a lifetime in chains. A second
attempt to run away would result in the slave having his ears, the tip
of his nose and, possibly, his right hand cutoff. This practice of
mutilation was later discontinued, not for humanitarian reasons, but out
of consideration for those who might take offence on seeing the
disfigurements. Runaways were often hanged, which was also the
sentence meted out to slaves found guilty of theft.
A slave woman
found guilty of murdering her baby (on dubious evidence, although she
‘confessed’ under torture) was sentenced to have both breasts torn
from her body with red-hot pincers, after which she was to be burnt. But
the Council of Justice reduced the sentence — it felt it would be more merciful for Susanna to
be sewn into a sack and dropped from a ship, far out in Table Bay.
For a slave to
raise his hand, whether armed or not, against his owner, or against
almost any other European, meant slow and painful torture on the wheel
(instrument that disjointed and broke bones), but did not actually kill.
A slave woman who set fire to her owner’s house was chained to a stake
and burnt to death. The remains of executed criminals were usually left
on display, until devoured by scavengers, at the place of execution or
at the scene where the crime was committed, as a ‘warning’ to other
slaves.
The most severe
sentence imposed on a white for the murder of a slave during the Dutch
period is thought have been that against burgher Godfried Meyhuijsen
who, after beating one of his slaves to death, was taken to the place
of execution, blindfolded and made to kneel while the executioner swung
a sword above his head to signify that he deserved to die. After that,
he was banished for life to Robben
Island and the Company confiscated all his possessions.
The British took a
different view, however. In 1822, Wilhelm Gebhart, 22-year-old son of the Dutch Reformed
Church minister in Paarl, appeared before Chief Justice Sir John Truter,
charged with the murder of a slave, Joris of Mozambique, whom Gebhart
had allegedly beaten to death. A plea of manslaughter was rejected, and
Gebhart was found guilty of willful murder and hanged. Some legends have
grown around the Gebhart case, presenting the young man as a victim of a slave
conspiracy.